Playing With Our Future: Child Care and Development Spending at Its Lowest Level in Over a Decade

March 13, 2012

State child care and preschool programs provide safe and affordable care that helps low- and moderate-income parents find and retain jobs. These programs are as important as ever as parents work to keep their jobs or return to the workforce in the aftermath of the Great Recession. In light of this, it is especially troubling, as we’ll show in an upcoming CBP report, that total spending for child care and development programs—which include child care, preschool, and afterschool programs—has dropped dramatically since 2007-08 and would fall even further under the Governor’s Proposed 2012-13 Budget. In just four years, child care and development spending in California has dropped from its peak by 22.7 percent, after adjusting for inflation. Under the Governor’s proposal, spending would fall by an additional 18.5 percent in 2012-13, to its lowest level since 1998-99. The CBP’s upcoming report will look at recent trends in state child care and development programs, examine recent spending cuts targeting child care and preschool, and highlight the importance of these programs for California’s working families.

– Sam Sellers


One, Two, Three, or More?

February 17, 2012

How do the various personal income tax initiatives potentially headed to the November ballot compare? An updated version of the CBP’s memo comparing the “big three” personal income tax measures is available here. A more detailed look at each of these measures, and a host of others that may or may not be headed to a ballot near you in November, is available on the Legislative Analyst’s website.

– Jean Ross


Measuring Up: The CBP’s Annual Chartbook Is Out

February 7, 2012

The California Budget Project (CBP) has released Measuring Up: The Social and Economic Context of the Governor’s Proposed 2012-13 Budget – the CBP’s signature annual ”chartbook.” This publication provides an overview of the Governor’s proposed spending plan and the social and economic context that will shape this year’s budget debate.

Measuring Up looks at:

  • How the economic downturn has contributed to the $9.2 billion budget shortfall facing California;
  • How the Governor’s proposed budget aims to close the budget gap;
  • What the Governor’s proposed budget would mean for state support for education, health and human services, and other key areas.

The full chartbook is available here.

– Steven Bliss


Who Would Pay the Governor’s Proposed Tax Increase?

February 3, 2012

The Governor’s Proposed 2012-13 Budget assumes the passage of a ballot measure that would add three new rates to the state’s income tax on high-income Californians and add a new 0.5 percent sales tax rate. For married taxpayers, the proposed measure would increase the tax on income between $500,000 and $600,000 from 9.3 percent to 10.3 percent, that on income of between $600,000 to $1 million to 10.8 percent, and that on income in excess of $1 million to 11.3 percent. The new income tax rates would apply for 2012 through 2016, while the sales tax rate would take effect January 1, 2013 and end December 31, 2016.

The Department of Finance estimates that the proposed tax measure would raise $6.9 billion, on average, between 2013-14 and 2015-16. In 2012-13, $2.5 billion would go toward an increase in the Proposition 98 school funding guarantee, and $4.4 billion would help close the budget gap. The Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates a somewhat smaller increase. Of the additional revenues, $1.2 billion would come from the sales tax rate and $5.8 billion from the higher income tax rates in 2011-12 and 2012-13.

Who would pay the proposed tax? An analysis by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy shows that the top 1 percent of Californians would pay the largest share of their income toward the new tax, while all Californians would pay the higher sales tax. The extremely progressive increase in the income tax – which would provide about two-thirds of the new revenues – would be modestly offset by a regressive increase in the sales tax.

As the CBP has previously noted, economists such as Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, argue that “Economic theory and evidence gives a clear and unambiguous answer: It is economically preferable to raise taxes on those with high incomes than to cut state expenditures.” Absent a balanced approach to closing the budget gap, Californians face even deeper cuts to schools, universities, and our other core public systems and structures.

–Jean Ross


Falling Behind

February 2, 2012

A new CBP report, Falling Behind: The Impact of the Great Recession and the Budget Crisis on California’s Women and Their Families, looks at the economic downturn’s effect on the state’s women, especially low-income women and single mothers.

The report shows that the budget crisis has resulted in severe cuts to supports for families as well as to programs that help women prepare for, find, and keep employment. These include major spending reductions to CalWORKs as well as to child care, Medi-Cal, in-home care, and postsecondary education. The report also shows that these cuts have come amid an economic downturn that has been hard on California’s women, especially single mothers.

The report finds that:

  • Employment and earnings among single mothers have dropped significantly during the economic downturn. In just three years – from 2007 to 2010 – the share of single mothers with jobs fell by more than 10 percentage points to 59 percent, its lowest point in almost 15 years, while the percentage of single-mother families living in poverty jumped to 36 percent.
  • The state cut a total of more than $3 billion from CalWORKs between 2008-09 and 2011-12, equal to about $3,000 for each of the 1.1 million children in the program.
  • The state has cut child care and preschool funding by a total of $1.5 billion over the past three years, eliminating services for tens of thousands of children – including 35,000 children in the current year alone.
  • Since 2007-08, state support for community colleges has dropped by almost one-fifth. Community college enrollment has dropped by almost 130,000 during this period, with women accounting for more than 80 percent of the decline.

Support for Falling Behind was provided by a grant from the Women’s Foundation of California. You can read the full report here and an executive summary of the report here.

– Steven Bliss


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.