January 28, 2010
I suppose I shouldn’t be surprised about voters’ lack of knowledge of where the state gets its money and how that money is spent. Urban legends about the budget abound on both the left and the right. Still, the findings of the Public Policy Institute of California’s (PPIC) new poll were a bit surprising. Nearly half (49 percent) of the Californians surveyed by the PPIC answered that prison spending accounted for the largest share of state spending. Perhaps even more surprising, only 16 percent correctly answered the question with K-12 education. While corrections spending is on the rise and school spending has declined, the state still spends more than four times as much on schools as it does on prisons and corrections.
Californians were almost as confused about where the state’s dollars come from, with slightly more than a quarter correctly answering the personal income tax, which, in fact provides over half of the state’s general purpose revenues.
Only 6 percent of Californians and 8 percent of likely voters correctly answered both questions. Yet, nearly three-quarters of those surveyed believe that the voters should decide major questions of how the state raises and spends its money at the ballot box.
Based on these findings, we’d posit that there’s a significant need for increasing voters’ knowledge of the basics of public finance: How the state raises money, where that money is spent, and the rules that govern budgetary decision-making. That’s a fundamental part of our mission here at the CBP and clearly we’ve got our work cut out for us.
– Jean Ross
May 29, 2009
A recent report that state spending on health care for state prisoners is nearly $500 million over budget this year helps shed light on one of the darker corners of the state budget: corrections.
Most Californians probably do not realize that the state’s prison costs have soared since the 1980s. In 1987-88, California spent 5 percent of its General Fund dollars on corrections, compared to 10 percent in 2007-08. In other words, “spending on corrections takes up about twice as much of the state budget [as] it did 20 years ago,” according to the Legislative Analyst’s Office (LAO). This trend is troubling because every dollar the state spends on prisons means one less dollar to spend on education, health and human services, or other programs.
At the same time, the average cost of incarcerating an inmate has more than doubled, rising from $19,500 in 1987-88 to $46,100 in 2007-08. One of the main reasons for this jump, according to the LAO, is the increase in inmate health care costs, which have risen by more than $1.5 billion since 2000, largely in response to a federal court order requiring the state to provide prisoners with a constitutionally acceptable level of care. Moreover, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) projects that the percentage of prisoners who are getting on in years will continue to rise sharply, a trend that would surely continue to drive up the state’s costs for inmate health care. CDCR projects that one-quarter (25.6 percent) of male inmates in California will be age 50 or older in 2018, compared to 13.2 percent in 2007 and just 3.9 percent back in 1988.
The kicker: Essentially all of these inmate health care costs are borne by the state, with little or no federal cost sharing. With the state facing projected multi-billion dollar budget gaps every year for the foreseeable future, it makes you wonder whether it’s time to turn back the clock and reduce, wherever appropriate, the number of aging prisoners for whom the state’s taxpayers are responsible.
– Scott Graves