<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Payday Loans: Bigger Is Not Better II</title>
	<atom:link href="http://californiabudgetbites.org/2009/06/19/payday-loans-bigger-is-not-better-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://californiabudgetbites.org/2009/06/19/payday-loans-bigger-is-not-better-ii/</link>
	<description>Serving Fresh Policy News and Views - One Post at a Time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 22:04:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Winkle</title>
		<link>http://californiabudgetbites.org/2009/06/19/payday-loans-bigger-is-not-better-ii/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emily Winkle]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 17:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiabudgetbites.org/?p=1002#comment-411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Payday lending opponents&#039; &quot;cycle of debt&quot; claim is not valid. CFSA&#039;s Best Practices indicate that any customer who cannot pay back the loan when it&#039;s due has the option of entering an extended payment plan. This option allows them to repay the loan over a period of additional weeks at no additional cost. Regulator reports showing that more than 90 percent of payday advances are repaid when due debunk the allegation that payday lenders don&#039;t consider borrowers&#039; ability to repay. Moreover, all reputable payday lenders have underwriting criteria and requirements of a steady income and checking account.

While other financial options like borrowing from family should be taken into consideration, payday loans are a viable alternative when one compares the fees of consumers&#039; other short-term credit options: $100 payday advance = $15 fee; overdraft protection = $29; late fee on a credit card bill = $37; $100 off-shore internet payday loan = $25 fee; bounced check and NSF/Merchant fee = $55. (Source: http://www.cfsa.net/cost_comparison.html) For information on other payday loan myths, visit https://www.checkngo.com/resources/faq/payday-loans/general/payday-loan-myths.aspx]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Payday lending opponents&#8217; &#8220;cycle of debt&#8221; claim is not valid. CFSA&#8217;s Best Practices indicate that any customer who cannot pay back the loan when it&#8217;s due has the option of entering an extended payment plan. This option allows them to repay the loan over a period of additional weeks at no additional cost. Regulator reports showing that more than 90 percent of payday advances are repaid when due debunk the allegation that payday lenders don&#8217;t consider borrowers&#8217; ability to repay. Moreover, all reputable payday lenders have underwriting criteria and requirements of a steady income and checking account.</p>
<p>While other financial options like borrowing from family should be taken into consideration, payday loans are a viable alternative when one compares the fees of consumers&#8217; other short-term credit options: $100 payday advance = $15 fee; overdraft protection = $29; late fee on a credit card bill = $37; $100 off-shore internet payday loan = $25 fee; bounced check and NSF/Merchant fee = $55. (Source: <a href="http://www.cfsa.net/cost_comparison.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cfsa.net/cost_comparison.html</a>) For information on other payday loan myths, visit <a href="https://www.checkngo.com/resources/faq/payday-loans/general/payday-loan-myths.aspx" rel="nofollow">https://www.checkngo.com/resources/faq/payday-loans/general/payday-loan-myths.aspx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia W. Neal</title>
		<link>http://californiabudgetbites.org/2009/06/19/payday-loans-bigger-is-not-better-ii/#comment-406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patricia W. Neal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiabudgetbites.org/?p=1002#comment-406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[correct &quot; word &quot; interest]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>correct &#8221; word &#8221; interest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia W. Neal</title>
		<link>http://californiabudgetbites.org/2009/06/19/payday-loans-bigger-is-not-better-ii/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patricia W. Neal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 18:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://californiabudgetbites.org/?p=1002#comment-405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louis the loan shark charges less interes than Payday Lenders.  Licensed Pawn brokers charge &quot; by law&quot; less interest than Payday Lenders.  Shame again on the legislature, putting special interests above good public policy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis the loan shark charges less interes than Payday Lenders.  Licensed Pawn brokers charge &#8221; by law&#8221; less interest than Payday Lenders.  Shame again on the legislature, putting special interests above good public policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

